How the Internet should have Developed or An Idea I’m Proposing

Facebook: The privacy saga continues

Imagine with me.  Imagine a world where all of the “stuff” I share on the internet is under my control.  It is under my control because it “lives” on a server I control.  Either that, or at a hosting provider I pay to host it.  Or even perhaps at a 3rd party hoster.  When I download an application to my mobile (like pintrest, instagram, etc…) instead of being asked to make an account with them, I’d enter a URL to my site and my credentials there.  Then, the stuff I share would end up with that URL.  Pintrest, instagram, facebook, etc… could get a pointer/link to my post at my site, but the actual thing lives there.  Why isn’t this the case?

Currently, there’s no one way to post things online.  The different content management systems (joomla, wordpress, etc…) all have different ways to login and different ways to post the content once you are logged in.  How would the internet have been different if someone had developed a common “web” API where any application, when given the correct credentials, could post to a given URL.  We–the creators of stuff–would then have much more control over our data.

Sure, not everyone can run their own server or want to pay for hosting (or could afford hosting).  I think for those people, 3rd party services would have (or could) spring up.  Each person would have their own home URL where they could post stuff to (think a facebook profile or google plus page).

Anyway, this is an idea I’ve been noodling through.  What do you think?

Image from opensource.com via flickr

Surface Pro 2

Surface (P365-296)

At work, we support loads of tech.  We’ve been having more and more people get surfaces….so we bought one.  It fell to me to break so we can figure out how to support people with them so I get to play with it.

Now, I’ve been wondering about getting one for the past year…so far, all my experience has done is really make me want one.  Here’s my initial impressions:

1) it is heavier than I thought it would be.  But, it is a real computer.  With a real operating system
2) I both love and hate the virtual keyboard.  
  a. I love it because when you go into number mode, you get symbols grouped off to one side with numbers on a virtual 10-key keypad.  MS’s business experience shines here.  
  b. I hate it for two reasons.  It doesn’t auto-pop when you select a text field.  When you long-press on the letter to get a number, the number isn’t auto selected.

As I play with it more, I’m sure I’ll get some more feedback to post.  Check back.

Image from steve petrucelli via flickr

New ISP

20131016_Sky 20131020_VPNSpeedTest
Sky (ISP No VPN) On StrongVPN

Well, we just signed up for Sky Fibre /  Fiber.  It isn’t really fiber to the house…but it is fiber to the cabinet. You can see the actual results above.  This is way different from our previous aDSL servce.  But, on top of this, I run Strong VPN through a dedicated router.  I spent the best part of this week trying to sort out the problem.  I learned two things:

1) How to calculate the maximum theoretical speed of a wan link.  With my latency to the states, the max speed I can expect to the states is around 7Mbps.
2) I upgraded dd-wrt to a new version.  I’m not real sure what the difference was/is but it works better.  The connection is more stable and I get better more reliable throughput.

[Update 2013-10-20 06:21:47] I finally got around to doing a speed test on the VPN that I think is representative of the speeds we really get.

Fiber / Fibre

Fibre optique

Well, BT just installed FTTC (fibre to the cabinet) in our neighborhood.  I just signed up for service…for an increase of £4.50 per month, we’ll increase our download speeds by a factor of more than 5.  (From 7ish Mbit/sec down to an estimated 40Mbit/sec down).  I’m stoked.

The install should happen on 16 October!

[Update 2013-10-18 22:17:57] Our fibre is installed!

image from fredrick bisson via flickr