DC

Cyndi and I went to DC today (I'll post pics later on…). We rode the metro–of course–to the Smithsonian station. We went to the WWII memorial, the Lincoln memorial, the Jefferson Memorial, we ate lunch at the Ronald Reagan building, tried to go to the National Aquarium, and spent some time in the Museum of American History. Here is the story of today.

Neither of us has been sleeping well, so we slept in (Cyndi later than me). We got ready and went into town. It was so so hot. I have never sweat so much doing nothing before. If you had seen me, you would have thought that I was running a marathon or something.

WWII Memorial

First, Cyndi wanted to go see the WWII memorial so we did that first. It was ok. I don't get exactly what the designers were going for, but who knows. The liberals have their influence here too. These two quotes are present on the memorial:

THEY HAVE GIVEN THEIR SONS TO THE MILITARY SERVICES. THEY HAVE STOKED THE FURNACES AND HURRIED THE FACTORY WHEELS. THEY HAVE MADE THE PLANES AND WELDED THE TANKS, RIVETED THE SHIPS AND ROLLED THE SHELLS. — President Franklin D. Roosevelt

WOMEN WHO STEPPED UP WERE MEASURED AS CITIZENS OF THE NATION, NOT AS WOMEN…THIS WAS A PEOPLE’S WAR, AND EVERYONE WAS IN IT. — Colonel Oveta Culp Hobby

Now, don't get me wrong…women made contributions in WWII, but so did everyone left behind. Why single women out seperate? Everything was rationed…what about including a quote about the kids who collected tires, grease, scrap metal, and everything else. What about a quote for the Japanese in the country who were put in "internment" camps. There is only one reason to include these quotes in a memorial for those who died serving in WWII and that is liberals trying too hard to be all inclusive. For me, it was simply distracting.

One thing that I really thought was really cool was the field of stars representing those who died. I'll post my own picture in a bit; however, the link above will give you an ok idea about what I'm talking about.

Lincoln Monument

Next, we went to the Lincoln Monument. I don't ever remember being here before, and I really enjoyed it. Pres. Lincoln has to be my favorite president ever. He saught God when he made decisions, he led the nation through the Civil War, and was the first Republican.

I admit it…I'm a Civil War buff. Contrary to what people are taught in schools, the Civil War was not about slavery or emancipation. The Civil War was fought by Lincolin to preserve the Union (Don't get me wrong…slavery was wrong; however, it wasn't THE reason for the Civil War). The south saw their rights being violated. If you want proof of what Lincoln thought, make sure you visit the "basement" of the Lincoln Monument (down where the restrooms are). There you will find many of Lincoln's quotes (I think I have pics that I'll post later) where he details that he is fighting the Civil War to preserve the Union.

Jefferson Monument

After visiting Lincoln, we walked over to the Jefferson Monument. This was another place I had never been before. If you are in DC, go here. Jefferson was the main person responsible for writing the Declaration of Independence. This document says (among other things): 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Ronald Reagan Building

After we left the Jefferson Monument, we went to the Ronald Reagan building. We were actually headed to the National Aquarium but we were looking for a place to eat. We asked a very nice security guard who mentioned that there was a food court in the basement of the building. We ate lunch there (typical fast food/food court fare). This isn't a memorial/monument…it is just named after Reagan (who, in my mind was probably the second best president behind Lincoln).

The signs indicated there was a metro stop here, but we couldn't figure out which one it was. Our best guess was the Federal Triangle stop. Use this information at your own risk….

As an aside, going in, we had to show some picture ID and go through metal detectors. The experience was very thorough and uneventful. I set of the metal detector. What happened? Was I treated like a criminal (like we are at airports in the US now)? Nope. The guy asked me to stand to the side and he wanded me. Once he was satisfied, I was allowed in. This is how airport security should be!

National Aquarium

Once we finished lunch (and cooled down in the AC), we continued on to the National Aquarium. We didn't actually get past the front door. Unlike the National Zoo and the various Smithsonian Museums, you have to pay to get in. I wasn't interested in paying to get in, so we turned around and left.

Museum of American History

To get back to the metro stop we wanted, we had to walk by the Museum of American History. I have to say…I think this was the biggest let-down of the day. First off, they don't have the pendulum that knocks over cones as the earth rotates anymore. They don't have the dragster, Fonz's jacket, or any of the really cool stuff that used to exist on the bottom floor. Most of the exibits were loaded with AMAZING MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATIONS (videos). In and of itself, this was only mildly annoying; however, these videos were produced by the History Chanel. This isn't necessarily bad…it just added to the annoyance factor. On top of that, the videos are copyrighted! This was unbelieveable. These videos were produced to be shown in a government institution. As such, they should be in the public domain (just like everything else the goverment does). If not the public domain, the information should be free.

On top of that, it is hard to find your way around the museum. It isn't well laid out. I think you should be able to walk through the museum in an orderly fashion and see everything. You shouldn't have to make u turns, walk over the same display twice, or meet dead ends. This museum has them all.

Several of the displays in the museum have a left-leaning slant. For example, the display on The Price of Freedom mentions major eras of war the US has gone through. They mention expansion, self-preservation, WWI, and WWII; however, they don't have a seperate category for the various wars that have been fought this century to provide freedom to various peoples (Korea, Vietnam, Gulf War, Afghanastan, Iraq, etc…). Now, they mention the wars; however, a visitor is left with the idea that the US never fights wars without wanting to expand colonies, etc…. There was also an exhibit on the role of the First Lady in politics. I couldn't even go in this one. I'll give you one guess as to what this is about. Hillary Rodham Rodham. Have you ever heard of First Lady Lincoln being involved in politics? How about First Lady Hayes?

Tomorrow

Tomorrow, we plan on going to Capitol Hill Baptist Church and–ta da–the Air and Space Museum. We are also going to visit the Museum of Natural History (although I plan on observing how left-leaning this museum is and writing on it tomorrow). Of these, the Air and Space museum is always the best. I have read they may have Spaceship 1 there.

Comice

Do you like comics? Then you may be interested in Comic Alert. They will allow you to build a favorites list of comics and then subscribe to is as an RSS feed. I just signed up today…I'll let everyone know how it is going after a few days.

Courts, Schools, and Christianity

Agape Press is reporting that a federal judge in Ohio has reversed a lower court ruling on the wearing of christian tshirts to school.

(AgapePress) – A federal judge has told an Ohio school district it can no longer bar a middle school student from wearing a t-shirt with a Christian message.

Judge George Smith has ruled that Sheridan Middle School in Thornville violated the constitutional rights of student James Nixon by prohibiting him from wearing a t-shirt bearing a quote from the Bible verse John 14:6. The front of the shirt reads: "Jesus said, 'I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life.'" The back of the shirt contains the statements: "Homosexuality is sin. Islam is a lie. Abortion is murder."

I'm glad that James and his parents were willing to take a stand. Remember, Christians are citizens too.

While I'm on this subject, isn't it interesting that those who claim to be tolerant, all-inclusive, and all-accepting are unwilling to practice what they "preach"? For example, they claim we must tolerate all religions; however, Christianity is not tolerated by them. I think that conservatives are much more tolerant. For example, I believe that Jesus is the Way, Truth, and Light. He is the only way to heaven. Since that is what I believe, that is what needs to be shared. People who believe differently will have to suffer the consequences if they choose not to belive. That is their own personal choice…a choice they should be allowed to make.

Starbucks

I was reading blogs this morning and came across this on Starbucks. I have heard of the issues with their cups but decided that it wasn't a big deal (they had many different people talking about "the way I see it")

Now, I'm confronted with this:

a letter to boycot starbucks. in it, it had stated that they supported a gay pride parade in San Diego and some other interesting items, thus the call was for people to boycott their venti double soy lattes with a singe mint twists ala mode w/ light foam, chocolate powder on and top extra hot. well, its not that i don't trust people, i do but i also like to make sure that facts are straight in order to protect the accuser as well as the accused. So after email #10 0r 11 i decided to email Starbucks corporate HQ for verification and accuracy of the widely circulated email

Well, it turns out that Starbucks did indeed respond:

Thank you for contacting Starbucks Coffee Company.

As a Company, we are deeply committed to our Mission Statement and Guiding Principles. One of our six principles is "embracing diversity as an essential component to the way we do business." This includes the gay and lesbian community.

Starbucks has a long history of giving back to communities where we operate. Supporting local events like the San Diego Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Pride Festival gives us the opportunity to give back to the community of San Diego. We also strive to support organizations that are important to our partners (employees) and customers. Starbucks was among many local and national companies listed as a sponsor and participant, including the San Diego County Police Chiefs and Sheriff's Association.

Starbucks is aware that three sex offenders volunteered for the San Diego Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Pride Festival this year. The three volunteers have resigned as Pride Festival volunteers. The Pride Festival organizers are also taking steps to institute new screening procedures for volunteers and staff who work at next year's event.

So, it turns out that it is true. And the company is proud of it. I wonder if they "supported any local events such as a Promise Keepers convention, a Christian movie night in the park, or any other such thing? Probably not, but I don't know for sure.

I usually didn't go to Starbucks all that much to start with–I thought their coffee was way way too expensive–but I probably won't be going at all now.

Missionary Documentary

Agape Press has a story today about a missionary documentary.

Beyond the Gates of Splendor details the deaths of missionaries Nate Saint, Jim Elliot, Pete Fleming, Ed McCully and Roger Youderian, who were violently killed in the remote Ecuadorian jungle by the notoriously savage Waodani tribe known then as Aucas. With first-hand accounts from the missionaries’ widows and interviews with their children and the actual tribesmen involved in the missionaries’ killings, the documentary provides a compelling look into the spearing deaths that providentially changed the violent nature of the tribe. It also details the remarkable story of how two American women reached out and brought peace to the Waodani people as a result of the spearings by living among the very people who killed their loved ones.

[Update 2012-12-26 16:12:07] Agape Press has changed names and I can’t find old articles.  I’ve updated the link to the wikipedia page on the theatrical version.

Harry Potter Bible School?

This is just nuts. A "church" in Pennsylvania has decided to do a Harry Potter themed Bible School this year.

According to Associated Press, "Wizards and Wonders: The Journey with Harry Potter" is, uh, taking off as young ones mount their broomsticks and learn to fly at the "Hogwarts School of Wizardry and Witchcraft" which teaches them this and other nuances of the interconnectedness of witches, wizards and magic with Scripture.

Far be it from the church growth pundits to criticize growth in any normal sense, especially when it comes from a denomination that has been losing members hand over fist for decades. But have we really digressed this far? Wizards? Flying broomsticks? Witchcraft … and the gospel of Jesus Christ?

Enrollment has doubled!

But, asks the holy skeptic, at what cost? The Episcopal Church, along with other mainline denominations, has cheapened Scripture (which didn't work for church growth), discounted traditional Judeo-Christian morality (which also didn't work for growth), lowered standards of membership (again, didn't work), and has so confused a church in Pennsylvania that its members decided to try Harry Potter to see if witches, wizards, and magic might not work wonders for the appeal of Christ.

But … enrollment has doubled!

ARG! This is exactly what is wrong with most churches. Yes, we have to figure out how to be relevant and reach people; however, we also have to be set apart and different (remember the salt and light?!). No wonder people are fleeing "church." They see this double standard. What is next, "Christian" strip joints to reach the people who go to strip joints? Christian porn (porn, but at the end, it has the plan of salvation or something) to reach them?

So Would You?

Persecution Blog today has a post that asks an interesting question:

If you said something on your website about your own personal beliefs and had someone tell you to apologize for it – would you?

It goes on to talk about two pastors who were accused of "vilifing" muslims who were persecuted under the Victorian hate speech law. What did they do? Well, it turns out that they simply told everyone to "love Muslims."

Fredric has this to say in the comments: 

Don't apologize! The law is wrong. If this is paid and followed, it is denying God and His Word. We see so many unwilling to back down for their beliefs here on this site ans suffer. If jail is all they face, then the pastors should not buckle, the church should rally behind them and a voice cry out against this.

I agree. Don't back down! Brothers and Sisters, so many believers are in chains around the world–yes, even today. They are standing up for the Truth. What makes us think it cannot happen here (here=wherever you are)? Chances are, it will eventually happen. We must decide today what we will do when that happens. So, my answer to this question is: 

if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD. (Joshua 24:15)

This brings up another interesting point. Americans, what if you are in a foreign country and the government tells you you cannot serve God? What would your answer be? Why do I ask? It turns out that China seems to be cracking down on more and more Americans too. Just so you know, my answer would be the same as above: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

Why would I take such a stand? Why would I be willing to die for Christ? Well, to me, it isn't about dying for Christ…it is about LIVING for Christ. God doesn't "call" people to die for Him; however, if in living for Him that is what we have to do to not deny God then that is what it takes. God "owns" me. He paid dearly for my life through the blood of His Son. Since I have already given my life to Him to do with as He pleases, it is just a matter of keeping on.

Gmail Invites

Just wanted to let everyone know that I have some gmail invites I'll give out. If you are interested, send me an e-mail. My contact information can be found here. Don't post in comments to this post…send me an e-mail. Oh, I'm going to be a bit selctive, so tell me what you want one for.

Church Missionary Detachment

I was reading this blog entry today on the church/missionary detachment. It gives me a chance to tell part of the reason I am a Southern Baptist. From the article:

Lately, I had a chance to think about a problem that most churches face relating to the missionaries they support: most missionaries feel distant from the churches that support them. The problem is made worse by the fact that most missionaries are supported by dozens or even hundreds of churches and often must spend the little time they have away from the mission field traveling from church to church in the hope of increasing their support. In response to this problem some churches such as Park Street Church in Boston have committed themselves to providing most or all of the support for a smaller number of missionaries.

Clearly, a situation in which missionaries must spend the better part of their furlough visiting church after church, thus depriving them of the ability to rest during their short time away from the mission field is far from ideal. If for no other reason than this, the model embraced by Park Street Church, in which a smaller number of missionaries receive all or nearly all of their support from a single church, seems a far better option.

Southern Baptist missionaries supported by the International Mission Board are fully supported. They don't have to worry about raising money. The Cooperative Program (combined with the Lottie Moon offering) provide 100% of the support SBC missionaries need in the field. When they are home on furlow (not really a vacation), they spend time with churches talking about the IMB, what is happening on the field, etc… When they are on vacation–yes, they get vacation too–they are on vacation.

This means that the missionaries don't have to worry about funding for next year, next month, or tomorrow. Southern Baptists cooperate together to support them.